8% Capsaicin Patch in Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is a complex condition that is difficult to control and has a high impact on quality of life. 8% Capsaicin patch can be a therapeutic strategy in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (1) evaluate clinical efficacy and (2) tolerability of 8% capsaicin patch in a Pain Unit. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Portuguese Pain Unit. METHODS: A sample of 120 patients diagnosed with peripheral neuropathic pain, underwent treatment with the 8% capsaicin patch between February 2011 and February 2019 in a Portuguese Pain Unit. Patients were included in one of the following groups according to the etiology of pain: postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP), post traumatic neuropathic pain (PTNP), diabetic neuropathy (DN), regional pain syndrome. complex I and II (CRPS I / II), HIV-associated neuropathy (HIVN), lumbar neuropathic pain (LNP), trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and other neuropathies (O). The evaluated parameters were: pain intensity according to unit protocol (numerical rating scale), pain characteristics, location, size of the painful area. The evolution of pain intensity after treatment (patients were considered as responders to therapy if the decrease in NRS was equal to or greater than 30%; patients with a decrease in NRS of 50% or more were also analyzed), the area of pain and the need for adjuvant analgesic therapy, as well as the tolerability to treatment and the identification of eventual predictors of its efficacy were evaluated, at 15 days, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after 8% capsaicin patch. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients in the sample, 40.8% had a >= 30% decrease in basal pain intensity 15 days after treatment, 43.3% after 8 weeks and 45.0% after 12 weeks. 30.8% of patients had >= 50% decreased basal pain intensity 15 days after treatment, 27.5% after 8 weeks and 30.0% after 12 weeks. Pain area decreased in 36.7% of patients and 18.3% reduced chronic analgesic therapy within 12 weeks after 8% capsaicin patch application. There was only one case of intolerance to the treatment. LIMITATIONS: This study has the limitations inherent to a retrospective study. The study period was only 12 weeks and some diagnostic groups included a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain with 8% capsaicin patch seem to be effective in the short and medium term, both in decreasing pain intensity and in reducing the painful area. Its application is tolerated by most patients.

Intrathecal Baclofen Infusion Pumps in the Treatment of Spasticity: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Portuguese Centre.

INTRODUCTION: Spasticity is a complex problem in patients with neurological disorders and may distress their quality of life. Intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps reduce spasticity with low doses and minimal side effects but are not free from complications. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps as well as patients' satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps placed up to December 2015. Demographic characteristics, clinical diagnoses, date of placement or withdrawal/replacement of intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps, baclofen dosage and complications of intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps were collected. Assessments from the Ashworth and Penn's scales, Katz index and patients' global satisfaction were analysed. RESULTS: In 19 years we placed 251 intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps in 155 patients. The mean age was 41.1 ± 15.8 years. The most frequent conditions were: trauma (34%), cerebral palsy (14%), multiple sclerosis (12%) and stroke (12%). Eighty-five patients (55%) required a second pump, and eleven (7%) a third one. The lifetime of the first pump was 72 (36 - 89) and the total follow-up time was 96 (9 - 132) months. The causes of withdrawal/replacement were: battery failure (57%), catheter migration/kinking (24%), infection (14%) and pump displacement/exteriorization (7%). The complication rate was 0.21 events/month. There was a significant improvement in the Ashworth and Penn's scales after the placemen of intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps (p < 0.001 for all diagnoses) and the patients were satisfied with the treatment. DISCUSSION: The incidence of complications was within range of other international studies despite our long follow-up time. Events per month, loss to follow-up, re-intervention rate, incidence of infection and mortality were similar to other studies. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal baclofen infusion pumps are safe and effective in the treatment of spasticity. Infusion pumps provide a high level of satisfaction regarding treatment and quality of life.

Introdução: A espasticidade é um problema complexo em doentes com distúrbios neurológicos influenciando a sua qualidade de vida. As bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno reduzem a espasticidade com doses baixas e efeitos laterais mínimos, mas não estão livres de complicações. Pretendemos avaliar a eficácia, segurança e satisfação dos doentes com bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno. Material e Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospetivo, incluindo todas as bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno colocadas até dezembro de 2015. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas, diagnósticos, data de colocação ou retirada/substituição e complicações das bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno. Analisaram-se as escalas Ashworth, Penn, Katz e satisfação dos doentes. Resultados: Durante 19 anos colocaram-se 251 bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno em 155 doentes. A idade média foi 41,1 ± 15,8 anos. As patologias mais freqüentes foram: traumatismo (34%), paralisia cerebral (14%), esclerose múltipla (12%) e acidente vascular cerebral (12%). Oitenta e cinco doentes (55%) precisaram de uma segunda e onze (7%) de uma terceira bomba. A semi-vida da primeira bomba foi 72 (36 ­ 89) e o tempo total de seguimento 96 (9 ­ 132) meses. As causas de retirada/substituição foram: falha de bateria (57%), migração/kinking do cateter (24%), infeção (14%) e deslocamento/exteriorização da bomba (7%). A taxa de complicações foi 0,21 eventos/mês. Houve uma melhoria significativa nas escalas de Ashworth e Penn após colocação das bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno (p < 0,001 para todos os diagnósticos) e os doentes ficaram satisfeitos com o tratamento. Discussão: A incidência de complicações situou-se dentro do intervalo reportado por outros estudos internacionais, apesar do longo tempo de seguimento. Número de eventos por mês, perda de seguimento, taxas de re-intervenção ou infecção e mortalidade foram semelhantes a outros estudos. Conclusão: As bombas perfusoras intratecais de baclofeno são seguras e eficazes no tratamento da espasticidade e oferecem um alto nível de satisfação quanto ao tratamento e qualidade de vida.

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Efficacy at Three Years' Follow-Up.

OBJECT: Chronic neuropathic pain is estimated to affect 3-4.5% of the worldwide population, posing a serious burden to society. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is already established for movement disorders and also used to treat some "off-label" conditions. However, DBS for the treatment of chronic, drug refractory, neuropathic pain, has shown variable outcomes with few studies performed in the last decade. Thus, this procedure has consensus approval in parts of Europe but not the USA. This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy at three years of DBS for neuropathic pain. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients received 36 months post-surgical follow-up in a single-center. Six had phantom limb pain after amputation and ten deafferentation pain after brachial plexus injury, all due to traumas. To evaluate the efficacy of DBS, patient-reported outcome measures were collated before and after surgery, using a visual analog scale (VAS) score, University of Washington Neuropathic Pain Score (UWNPS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Contralateral, ventroposterolateral sensory thalamic DBS was performed in sixteen patients with chronic neuropathic pain over 29 months. A postoperative trial of externalized DBS failed in one patient with brachial plexus injury. Fifteen patients proceeded to implantation but one patient with phantom limb pain after amputation was lost for follow-up after 12 months. No surgical complications or stimulation side effects were noted. After 36 months, mean pain relief was sustained, and the median (and interquartile range) of the improvement of VAS score was 52.8% (45.4%) (p = 0.00021), UWNPS was 30.7% (49.2%) (p = 0.0590), BPI was 55.0% (32.0%) (p = 0.00737), and SF-36 was 16.3% (30.3%) (p = 0.4754). CONCLUSIONS: DBS demonstrated efficacy at three years for chronic neuropathic pain after traumatic amputation and brachial plexus injury, with benefits sustained across all pain outcomes measures and slightly greater improvement in phantom limb pain.

Results of Lumbar Endoscopic Adhesiolysis Using a Radiofrequency Catheter in Patients with Postoperative Fibrosis and Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Discectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of lumbar epiduroscopic adhesiolysis using mechanical methods and a radiofrequency catheter followed by epidural steroid and local anesthetic administration in patients with postoperative fibrosis and persistent or recurrent symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Patients with persistent or recurrent low back and/or lower limb pain after lumbar spine surgery, in whom no relevant findings were present on MR images besides epidural scar tissue, were submitted to epiduroscopic adhesiolysis. Patient-reported outcomes including pain and disability were assessed in predefined time intervals and compared to baseline. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. It was possible to elicit the patient's usual pain by probing the epidural scar tissue in all patients. Statistically significant improvement in low back and lower limb pain was observed in all assessment periods up to 12 months. A pain relief over 50% was achieved in 71% of the patients at 1 month, 63% at 3 and 6 months, and 38% at 12 months. Disability scores significantly improved for around 6 months. Mean patient satisfaction rates were 80% at 1 month, 75% at 3 months, 70% at 6 months, and 67% 1 year after intervention. Only 1 transient postprocedural complication was detected. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic adhesiolysis is a potentially useful treatment for the relief of chronic intractable low back and lower limb pain in patients with previous lumbar spine surgery and epidural fibrosis. The use of larger volumes of saline during endoscopy and the employment of radiofrequency for the lysis of epidural adhesions are safe procedures, which may provide an additional benefit to the intervention.

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for neuropathic pain after amputation or brachial plexus avulsion.

OBJECT: Fifteen hundred patients have received deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat neuropathic pain refractory to pharmacotherapy over the last half-century, but few during the last decade. Deep brain stimulation for neuropathic pain has shown variable outcomes and gained consensus approval in Europe but not the US. This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy at 1 year of DBS for phantom limb pain after amputation, and deafferentation pain after brachial plexus avulsion (BPA), in a single-center case series. METHODS: Patient-reported outcome measures were collated before and after surgery, using a visual analog scale (VAS) score, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and University of Washington Neuropathic Pain Score (UWNPS). RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated over 29 months, receiving contralateral, ventroposterolateral sensory thalamic DBS. Five patients were amputees and 7 had BPAs, all from traumas. A postoperative trial of externalized DBS failed in 1 patient with BPA. Eleven patients proceeded to implantation and gained improvement in pain scores at 12 months. No surgical complications or stimulation side effects were noted. In the amputation group, after 12 months the mean VAS score improved by 90.0% ± 10.0% (p = 0.001), SF-36 by 57.5% ± 97.9% (p = 0.127), UWNPS by 80.4% ± 12.7% (p < 0.001), and BPI by 79.9% ± 14.7% (p < 0.001). In the BPA group, after 12 months the mean VAS score improved by 52.7% ± 30.2% (p < 0.001), SF-36 by 15.6% ± 30.5% (p = 1.000), UWNPS by 26.2% ± 40.8% (p = 0.399), and BPI by 38.4% ± 41.7% (p = 0.018). Mean DBS parameters were 2.5 V, 213 microseconds, and 25 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Deep brain stimulation demonstrated efficacy at 1 year for chronic neuropathic pain after traumatic amputation and BPA. Clinical trials that retain patients in long-term follow-up are desirable to confirm findings from prospectively assessed case series.